Sponsored By The Law Office of Clifford J. Geismar P.A.

 

No-Fault Breakup

Rodger admitted that it was he alone who called off his engagement to marry Janis, but he still wanted the return of the expensive engagement ring he had given her. When Janis refused, Rodger sued to get the ring back, and he won.

It was settled law in the state that any engagement gift, including a ring, is a conditional gift that must be returned if the condition is not fulfilled. Janis argued that her acceptance of Rodger's marriage proposal was the satisfied condition. The court ruled instead that the condition that must occur for the gift to hold up is the marriage itself.

Janis also argued that, even if the condition for the gift had not been met, a giver should have no right to a return of the gift when the giver breaks off the engagement. The court conceded that this has some superficial appeal to our sense of justice where one person truly has "wronged" the other. Of course, the rule would be unfair when the giver had compelling reasons to call off the engagement.

The court's greater concern, however, was that the ending of most "modern relationships" is rarely so cut and dried. Ascertaining who was "at fault" would "invite the parties to stage the most bitter and unpleasant accusations against those whom they nearly made their spouse." The process would also amount to opening a Pandora's box: Is a breakup justified by having nothing in common; dislike of prospective in-laws; a hostile minor child; incompatible pets; irritating habits; religious differences, etc.?

Rather than requiring courts to undertake the thorny task of finding fault, the court borrowed from the approach used in a no-fault divorce. some form of which exists in all 50 states. If, as in the case of Rodger and Janis, the marriage is called off, the giver of the engagement ring is entitled to its return, with no investigation into the 'motives or reasons for the breakup.

Assumption of Risk ] Digital Audio Recording ] The Domain Name Game ] Business Entity Basics ] Estate Planning ] Fraudulent Hiring ] Sexual Harassment in Employment ] FDIC Insurance Pitfalls ] [ No-Fault Breakup ] OSHA Telecommuting Rules ] Estate Planning ] The Great Pretender ] What Is Title Insurance? ] You May Not Already Be a Winner ]

RETURN TO NEWSLETTER TOC

Law Office of Clifford J. Geismar
2431 Aloma Avenue, Suite 150
Winter Park, Florida 32792
407· 673· 1087 1· 888· 673· 1087
Fax : 407· 673· 0375

Copyright © 2004 [Florida Legal Answers]. All rights reserved.
Revised: July 8, 2004 .

Site designed and maintained by Winter Park Artists, Inc